Why AI-authorship debates miss a deeper shift in how scholarly knowledge is produced

Nature作者:Phil Hutchinson2026年9月29日正文已收录本站
  • CORRESPONDENCE

By

  • Phil Hutchinson0
  1. Phil Hutchinson
    1. Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.

    View author publications

    Search author on: PubMed  Google Scholar

  • Email
  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Whatsapp
  • X
Save article

View saved research

Robert Braun proposes that artificial-intelligence use be reported when AI tools materially shaped a scholarly contribution (see Nature 657, 34–36; 2026). But authorship-contribution taxonomies might be too coarse for a growing form of AI use: sustained intellectual interaction.

Access options

Access through your institution

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

27,99 € / 30 days

cancel any time

Learn more

Subscription info for Chinese customers

We have a dedicated website for our Chinese customers. Please go to naturechina.com to subscribe to this journal.

Go to naturechina.com

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 658, 286 (2026)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-03055-6

Competing Interests

The author declares no competing interests.

  • Who is responsible when AI helps to write science?

  • AI, peer review and the human activity of science

  • AI scientists are changing research — institutions, funders and publishers must respond

  • When AI does science, who is accountable for mistakes?

Subjects

  • Authorship
  • Publishing
  • Ethics
  • Scientific community

Latest on:

  • Authorship
  • Publishing
  • Ethics
  • When AI does science, who is accountable for mistakes?

    Correspondence

  • Who is responsible when AI helps to write science?

    Comment

  • ‘A waste of time for all of us’: caught in the crossfire of the peer-review wars

    Career Feature

  • Paid to peer review: firms are paying researchers to assess manuscripts for journals

    News

  • Competition heats up in the regenerative-medicine ranks

    Nature Index

  • Hundreds of ‘free’ academic journals have started charging fees

    Nature Index

  • PhD training should encourage ethical dissent

    Correspondence

  • Lack of female researchers and participants in regenerative-medicine research holds everyone back

    Nature Index

  • What is needed for regenerative medicine to flourish?

    Nature Index

Nature Careers

Jobs

  • Multiple Positions Open in the Stomatology Hospital, ZJUSS

    Leaders or Principal Investigators, Faculty and Postdoc positions are open all year

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang (CN)

    The Stomatology Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine

  • Postdoctoral Fellows Recruitment Announcement at Shenzhen Bay Laboratory

    Substantial Funding for Postdoctoral Research

    Shenzhen, Guangdong (CN)

    Shenzhen Bay Laboratory

  • Faculty Positions at SUSTech Department of Biomedical Engineering

    We seek outstanding applicants for full-time tenure-track/tenured faculty positions. Positions are available for both junior and senior-level.

    Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

    Southern University of Science and Technology (Biomedical Engineering)

  • Postdoc Opportunity at MSK: Research Scholar, Computational Oncology/Immuno Oncology

    We are seeking a highly motivated computational biology postdoctoral fellow

    New York City, New York (US)

    Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

  • Postdoctoral Fellow, Computational Immuno-Oncology and Immune-Related Adverse Events

    Join the Reznik Laboratory within MSK’s Computational Oncology Service

    New York City, New York (US)

    Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center