- CORRESPONDENCE
By
- Pandora Pound1 &
- Anke Brüning-Richardson2
-
Yun Wah Lam
-
Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong.
-
-
Pandora Pound
-
Safer Medicines Trust, Kingsbridge, UK.
-
-
Anke Brüning-Richardson
-
University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK.
-
In your Career feature, a PhD student distressed by killing two or three mice daily asks for “suggestions for coping mechanisms” (see Nature https://doi.org/rp77; 2026). The advice includes “getting enough sleep, eating well, exercising” and memorializing the euthanized animals. This is similar to telling someone who witnessed animal cruelty to practise self-care. Such support might help to protect the student’s well-being, but also risks treating an ethical conflict as a resilience problem.
Nature 658, 286 (2026)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-03053-8
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Related Articles
-
My research on mice is causing me stress. How can I become more resilient?
-
The age of animal experiments is waning. Where will science go next?
-
Animal research is not always king: researchers should explore the alternatives
Subjects
Latest on:
- Ethics
- Education
- Animal behaviour
-
Why AI-authorship debates miss a deeper shift in how scholarly knowledge is produced
Correspondence
-
Lack of female researchers and participants in regenerative-medicine research holds everyone back
Nature Index
-
What is needed for regenerative medicine to flourish?
Nature Index
-
In praise of human teachers: universities must resist outsourcing everything to AI
Editorial
-
How to stay smart in the age of AI: the science of critical thinking
News Feature
-
How do I rekindle my motivation for earning my PhD?
Career Feature
-
Bumblebees don’t mind a little plastic in their honeypots
Research Highlight
-
Neuronal detection of social actions directs collective escape behaviour
Article
-
Too much mate choice overwhelms frogs
Research Highlight