- CORRESPONDENCE
By
-
Carlos Garcia-Soto
-
Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Santander, Spain.
-
Nature’s news coverage has highlighted the need to disclose when artificial intelligence has shaped scientific writing (see Nature 655, 556–557; 2026). However, in global assessments of climate change, report authors must look further upstream in the process, because the use of AI tools can change a report’s findings before a single word is written. In March, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) announced that it was developing AI support for literature reviews and processing reviewer comments (see go.nature.com/4ibf4d2). These tools could alter which evidence becomes visible, how studies are grouped and which signals reach authors’ attention.
Nature 657, 848 (2026)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-02905-7
Competing Interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Related Articles
-
AI scientists are changing research — institutions, funders and publishers must respond
-
Why AI cannot do good science without humans
-
The uncritical adoption of AI in science is alarming — we urgently need guard rails
Subjects
Latest on:
- Climate change
- Policy
- Communication
-
Why Nepal floods resulted in a disaster even after satellites spotted danger
Correspondence
-
Underground hydrogen could spur a green-energy revolution — if companies can find it
News Feature
-
How is climate change affecting conifers and their ability to sequester carbon?
News & Views
-
A wake-up call: diversify global research funding
Correspondence
-
Why Nepal floods resulted in a disaster even after satellites spotted danger
Correspondence
-
CRISPR crops are coming to Europe — why bolder would be better
World View
-
A guide to emotional intelligence in the lab
Career Feature
-
Dolly Parton dies aged 80 — researchers celebrate her contributions to science
News
-
Ancient surveying instrument found in Egypt
News & Views