A wake-up call: diversify global research funding

The US National Science Foundation is set to issue its lowest number of new grants in four decades, after centrally withholding some US$1 billion for the White House’s Grand Research Challenges initiative and withdrawing recommendations to fund more than 150 peer-reviewed proposals (see Nature 657, 18–19; 2026). While the United States retreats, other nations are expanding. The National Natural Science Foundation of China will increase the number of prestigious grants it offers to early-career scientists by 50% this year (see Nature 655, 557–558; 2026). This divergence signals a historic inflection point: as US policy volatility drives away international talent and collaboration, the global research community must build alternative hubs.

Nature 657, 848 (2026)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-02904-8

Related Articles

• Exclusive: NSF set to issue lowest number of new grants in four decades

• Why China should reassess how it rewards young scientists

• Some US researchers want to leave the country. Can Europe take them?

Subjects

Latest on:

• Funding
• Scientific community
• Policy

• Why the NIH must resist the metrics trap

  Correspondence 15 SEP 26

• 

  Donor-funded science is rising in Brazil ― upending a long tradition

  News 14 SEP 26

• 

  UK universities are on the brink — what is their greatest source of stress?

  Career Feature 14 SEP 26

• Why the NIH must resist the metrics trap

  Correspondence 15 SEP 26

• Why Nepal floods resulted in a disaster even after satellites spotted danger

  Correspondence 15 SEP 26

• Make AI traceable before it shapes global climate assessments

  Correspondence 15 SEP 26

• Why Nepal floods resulted in a disaster even after satellites spotted danger

  Correspondence 15 SEP 26

• Make AI traceable before it shapes global climate assessments

  Correspondence 15 SEP 26

• 

  CRISPR crops are coming to Europe — why bolder would be better

  World View 15 SEP 26